Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Evol Appl ; 16(1): 3-21, 2023 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2311634

ABSTRACT

Evolution has traditionally been a historical and descriptive science, and predicting future evolutionary processes has long been considered impossible. However, evolutionary predictions are increasingly being developed and used in medicine, agriculture, biotechnology and conservation biology. Evolutionary predictions may be used for different purposes, such as to prepare for the future, to try and change the course of evolution or to determine how well we understand evolutionary processes. Similarly, the exact aspect of the evolved population that we want to predict may also differ. For example, we could try to predict which genotype will dominate, the fitness of the population or the extinction probability of a population. In addition, there are many uses of evolutionary predictions that may not always be recognized as such. The main goal of this review is to increase awareness of methods and data in different research fields by showing the breadth of situations in which evolutionary predictions are made. We describe how diverse evolutionary predictions share a common structure described by the predictive scope, time scale and precision. Then, by using examples ranging from SARS-CoV2 and influenza to CRISPR-based gene drives and sustainable product formation in biotechnology, we discuss the methods for predicting evolution, the factors that affect predictability and how predictions can be used to prevent evolution in undesirable directions or to promote beneficial evolution (i.e. evolutionary control). We hope that this review will stimulate collaboration between fields by establishing a common language for evolutionary predictions.

2.
PLoS One ; 17(11): e0274407, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2109309

ABSTRACT

Since early March 2020, government agencies have utilized a wide variety of non-pharmaceutical interventions to mitigate the spread of COVID-19 and have struggled to determine when it is appropriate to return to in-person activities after an outbreak is detected. At many universities, fundamental issues related to understanding the spread of the disease (e.g. the transmission rate), the ability of administrators to respond quickly enough by closing when there is a sudden rise in cases, and how to make a decision on when to reopen remains a concern. Surveillance testing strategies have been implemented in some places, and those test outcomes have dictated whether to reopen, to simultaneously monitor community spread, and/or to isolate discovered cases. However, the question remains as to when it is safe to reopen and how much testing is required to remain safely open while keeping infection numbers low. Here, we propose an extension of the classic SIR model to investigate reopening strategies for a fixed testing strategy, based on feedback from testing results. Specifically, we close when a predefined proportion of the population becomes infected, and later reopen when that infected proportion decreases below a predefined threshold. A valuable outcome of our approach is that our reopening strategies are robust to variation in almost all model parameters, including transmission rates, which can be extremely difficult to determine as they typically differ between variants, location, vaccination status, etc. Thus, these strategies can be, in theory, translated over to new variants in different regions of the world. Examples of robust feedback strategies for high disease transmission and a fixed testing capacity include (1) a single long lock down followed by a single long in-person period, and (2) multiple shorter lock downs followed by multiple shorter in-person periods. The utility of this approach of having multiple strategies is that administrators of universities, schools, business, etc. can use a strategy that is best adapted for their own functionality.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Communicable Disease Control/methods , Schools , Disease Outbreaks/prevention & control , Universities
3.
Crim Behav Ment Health ; 32(3): 154-158, 2022 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2030936
4.
Telehealth and Medicine Today ; 7(2), 2022.
Article in English | ProQuest Central | ID: covidwho-2026490

ABSTRACT

Dr. Bailey discusses the evolving role physicians play in healthcare related to policy and technology including telehealth and remote care. Biography Dr. Bailey is a distinguished allergist/immunologist from Fort Worth, Texas, is immediate past president of the American Medical Association. A fierce advocate for physician autonomy and private practice, Dr. Bailey has held numerous leadership positions with the AMA and has also represented the AMA on the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education, the American Board of Medical Specialties, and COLA. Dr. Bailey has been an allergist in private practice for over 30 years and completed her residency in general pediatrics and a fellowship in allergy/immunology at the Mayo Graduate School of Medicine in Rochester, Minnesota. She has been awarded the title of Distinguished Fellow of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology. Dr. Bailey was later appointed to the Texas A& M System Board of Regents by then-Gov. George W. Bush, and has been named a Distinguished Alumnus of Texas A&M University and of Texas A&M University College of Medicine.

5.
Rhode Island Medical Journal ; 104(3):14-14, 2021.
Article in English | Academic Search Complete | ID: covidwho-1173186
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL